The Jewish Question, Answered

critiqueFor anyone with a limited understanding of Jewish history and a grudge against the Jews, MacDonald’s thesis that Jews are driven by “ethnic interest” is the equivalent of the Grand Unified Theory in physics. Accordingly, he has a cult-like following who reason that his ideas must be promulgated by any means. So, it must have come as a shock that Oxfordian Nathan Cofnas pointed out contradictions and cherry-picking of sources in MacDonald’s work.


I. Flawed intellectual constructs

If we analyze where MacDonald’s ethnic interest theory went wrong, perhaps we could get a better understanding of the “Jewish Question.”

A. Israeli politics are the most polarized in the developed world. Contemporary Jews are riven with sectarianism and therefore are the antithesis of a group evolutionary interest.

B. The bête noir of MacDonald’s paradigm, ethno-centric Jews, are, in actuality, Orthodox Jews, who may even be more “pro-White” than Whites are.

C. MacDonald spent a book defining Orthodox Jewry as an evolutionary strategy. Indeed, the population of Ashkenazi Jews in Europe increased from 1,000 to 9 million from 1000 AD to 1933. Yet, the Jewish Left is a counter-reaction to this yoke of the Torah that enabled “history’s greatest survivors”; i.e., the Jewish Left is an anti-evolutionary strategy akin to the Shakers.

D. Secular Jews don’t have many children, out-marry, and agitate provocatively against traditional values (both Jewish and Christian). As Leftists gained hegemony, the number of Jews in Europe declined from 9.5 to 1.4 million. Similarly, the Jewish population in the United States has experienced a relative decline of nearly 50% since 1955.

E. The Jewish Left’s activism produces a predictable blowback of anti-Semitism, leading to such consequences as the Holocaust and today’s AltRight. The Jewish Left’s peculiar death drive extends to making common cause with Jewry’s existential enemies, like the Palestinians, Iran, and Hezbollah, and giving nuclear secrets to Stalin, who would target the surviving post-war Jewish community of New York City. So, rather than acting in any coherent evolutionary strategy, the Jewish Left has repeatedly endangered the survival of Jewry.

MacDonald’s ethno-centric thesis seems reasonable enough, and it even may work when applied to traditional Jewry. Yet, why does it fail when applied to left-wing Jews?  This essay will present a parallel thesis to that presented by Moldbug:

The “ultracalvinist hypothesis” is the proposition that the present-day belief system commonly called “progressive,” “multiculturalist,” “universalist,” “liberal,” “politically correct,” etc, is actually best considered as a sect of Christianity.

Similarly, the Jewish secular Left appears to be acting as rival sect causing in-group conflict with right-wing Jewry. Maybe Jews do operate in a group evolutionary strategy at certain times and on some level as MacDonald describes, but in a climate of sectarian conflict this is hardly a useful analytical paradigm because sectarian interests will constantly intercede. Indeed, while MacDonald admits his paradigm does not have predictive abilities, the sectarian paradigm presented in this essay does.

In the last 30 seconds of this video, Ben Shapiro goes beyond statistics and delves into the red pill: the Jewish Left is distinctively hostile to traditional biblical values. (Watch the entire video for a full background on the Orthodox/secular Jewish contrast).

In an extraordinary coincidence, none of the Jewish radicals in Culture of Critique are Orthodox. Yet, MacDonald dismisses Jewish theology as merely “protective clothing” for group interests. He describes Jewry as acting like a collective fleet of ships with individual ships pursuing different strategies (but with the same goal). Yet, he provides no evidence of what inter-denominational (i.e. ethnic interest) force could be the admiral guiding these “ships”; MacDonald is resorting to teleological reasoning with no underlying mechanism.

MacDonald has stated that a refutation of his work would need to show that Jewish intellectuals were not motivated by Jewish interest or that his historical narratives were false. Thus, if it could be shown that Jewish intellectuals were sectarian in motivation, it would refute his theory since sectarian interests are distinct from and often trump ethnic ones. Further, this essay will refute the five most important AltRight narratives: Jewish ethno-centrism is historically static, the Russian Revolution, the Holocaust, Jewish support of immigration, and the Iraq War.



II. Improper ethnography

MacDonald extensively sources his work, but he conducts little field work with Jews, violating the best practices of ethnography. Consequently, he leaves himself open to observation bias.

Right-wing Jews are reticent to express their hostility of left-wing Jews because of Lashon Ha-Ra and Chilul Hashem. Further, many leftist Jews have qualms that insulting fellow Jews could feed into a climate of anti-Semitism. As a result, an outside observer would mistakenly assume that Jewish sectarian disputes are minimal.

What do right-wing Jews actually think of their left-wing co-ethnics?

Of course, the rest of us know that these too-educated glib leaders are the eternal Jewish ‘luftmenschen’ who have always plagued our communities; ungrounded, heads in the air, they believe their own words are a substitute for the hard work people perform to earn a living.
We have known them forever. They are our family members and friends who were socialists, communists, union organizers, deacons in the church of black civil rights, anti-war protesters, and now members of the army of Jews working in our communal organizations.
And we are weary of their endless lectures and rants, and particularly of their juvenile spouting about morality and justice.




III. Early Jewish Leftist Sectarians

MacDonald largely omits the influential early figures of the Jewish Left who were persecuted by the Jewish Right:

1. Spinoza (1626-1677) was excommunicated by the Amsterdam Jewish community. Spinoza is commonly regarded as the top enlightenment philosopher.Portrait_of_Shabtai_Tzvi

2. Sabbati Zevi (1626-1676) was a false messiah who led a mass movement of Jews to reject the traditional rabbinical order. Zevi’s message was the exact opposite of traditional Torah values: what is holy, unholy; unholy, holy. He was ultimately rejected by the Rabbinate of Jerusalem and then taken to the Turks and forced to convert to Islam. According to Gershom Scholem, Sabbati Zevi was the intellectual inspiration for Reform Judaism.

jacob-frank-c1726-1791-granger3. Jacob Frank (1726-1791) claimed to be the reincarnation of Zevi. Gershom Scholem described: “Frank will always be remembered as one of the most frightening phenomena in the whole of Jewish history.” Frank promoted ideas like sexual decadence, feminism, communism, and Zionism. He even had a coterie of female bodyguards, like Gaddafi, and engaged in ritualized orgies. Frank appears to have been the first major modern feminist, including insisting on a female Moshiach.

Frank tricked Christian rulers and bishops into supporting his degenerate movement. He promoted blood libel and encouraged the burning of Talmuds.

lossy-page1-418px-chacham_tzvi_largeFrank entered into a confrontation with Rabbi Yahhkov Emden. Emden was an inquisitor of Sabbateans, like his father before him, and his great-grandfather had summoned the Golem of Prague. Emden and Christian authorities ultimately forced Frank’s movement largely underground.

Rabbi Emden wrote a Christian apologia, remarkable in Jewish history, and even attempted to warn Christendom about the apocalyptic nature of the Sabbateans:

For it is recognized that also the Nazarene and his disciples, especially Paul, warned concerning the Torah of the Israelites, to which all the circumcised are tied. And if they are truly Christians, they will observe their faith with truth, and not allow within their boundary this new unfit Messiah Shabbetai Zevi who came to destroy the Earth.

With the arrival of these Jewish leftists, the dynamic of Jewish history changes from MacDonald’s conception of static ethno-centrism to one of constant internal strife.  Further, Jews will reach out to like-minded gentile groups in their sectarian struggle.




IV. Zionism and Leftist Sectarianism

Zionists were infatuated with Sabbatai Zevi and Frank, inspired by their heresy, their messianism and their subversion of rabbinic authority.
The Heresy we Forgot

Horace Kallen was the inventor of multiculturalism, an influential Zionist, and another character in The Culture of Critique described as ethno-centric, yet, like the intellectuals listed above, he seemed to hold an obsession with defiling traditional Judaism. Kallen’s Zionism was to provide a form of rival secular religion; he insisted on holding meetings of his Zionist group during the Sabbath (violating the 4th commandment).

Kallen’s leadership, particularly his neglect of Jewish tradition, irritated some members of the Parushim; they resented, for instance, his calling meetings for the Jewish Sabbath. “Since I understand that ours is not a separatist Order in the sense that it does not exclude any Jew who has proved his complete devotion to the Zionist cause,” wrote Jesse Sampter, “it would be unkind, unfair and unjust to call a meeting at this particular time [Friday evening].”

In addition to Kallen, Israel Zangwill was another advocate for immigration. He wrote The Melting Pot and was the first proponent of Islamic immigration. Similarly to Kallen, Zangwill wrote in support of Sabbati Zevi’s heresy and sexual subversion. Interestingly, here’s a sectarian bloodsport between Zangwill and a more traditionalist Jewish contemporary.

Labor Zionists, like Kallen and Zangwill, often believed that: More than the Jewish People have kept the Sabbath, the Sabbath has kept the Jews. So, they viewed the Sabbath as a peculiarity of Diaspora Jews to maintain their distinct identity. If you wanted to get rid of the Sabbath, then get Jews out of the Diaspora and into Israel. Further, if radical secularists controlled Jerusalem, they would have weight over all of Jewry; it was the Rabbinate of Jerusalem that rebuked Sabbati Zevi.

According to this plan, Israel was to be a far left-wing social democracy. Early Israeli Zionists often lived in secularized communist-style Kibbutzim that were reputedly “hot houses” of sexual libertines. Yet, what followed was one of the most astonishing reversals of fortune, ever.

As Stalin realized, the formation of Israel shifted formerly communist Jews into nationalists. Further, the popularity of Religious Zionism, a hybrid of Zionism and Orthodox Judaism, began to steadily increase in the 1950s and thereafter. So, Israel became a nation of Jewish paladins, replacing the Knights Templar as defenders of the Holy Land.tank

V. Leftist sectarians now oppose Israel

Given that Israel is now an anti-Islamist exemplar, increasing Leftist Jewish opposition fits within the far left’s quasi-Jihadi trend. About 20% of BDS members on campus are Jewish. Views on Israel are widely polarized with secular Jews being over six times more likely to support a fully-democratic Israel than religious Jews. This implies they would support Israel ceasing to be a Jewish state if it lost a Jewish plurality.

Nathan Cofnas pointed out that many of the intellectuals in Culture of Critique seemed to be opposed to Israel. This seemingly “self-hating” Jewish support of the Palestinian cause even extends to that institutional epicenter of “Jewish intellectual movements,” Columbia University. Professor Edward Said was the strongest intellectual advocate Palestinian cause and had a protégé in Barack Obama. Indeed, history may prove Said to have been the most influential intellectual of the late 20th century as he aligned Arabs with Marxist conceptions of victimhood, helping to support Islamic immigration.




VI. Post-Emancipation Jewish Intellectuals

The 19th century did not yet have Religious Zionism or Modern Orthodox as major movements within the confines of Halachic Judaism. The result was a situation rife with sectarianism because of the massive gulf between Orthodox and Sabbatean-influenced Reformed.

After Napoleon “liberated” the Jewish ghettos and the subsequent emancipations, Jews had no clear religious place. Many Orthodox Jews even opposed this “liberation.”

captureWhen ancient opinions of life are taken away, the loss cannot possibly be estimated. From that moment we have no compass to govern us; nor can we know distinctly to what port we steer….
~Edmund Burke 

Newly emancipated Jews become like Kubrick’s untethered astronaut in 2001: A Space Odyssey. Thus, Jews were forever cleaved in half: Jews who remained in the ghetto Orthodox world and those who abandoned links to their past. Given the intractable theological distinctions between these two wings of Jewry, perpetual group conflict would be foreordained, ironically, in a manner akin to MacDonald’s theories. This dichotomy persists to this day: Ideologically, Jews look like a bar bell with polar extremes.

Freud is a good example of a Jewish heretic. In a notorious meeting with a rabbi, Freud is reputed to have disclosed his view, expressed in Moses and Monotheism, that Moses was a Pharaoh and killed by Jews. Freud bolted out of the meeting after the rabbi became incensed.

Perhaps Freud did feel a lingering attachment to his Jewishness, but his work subverted traditional morality with no special exclusion for Orthodox Judaism. Many of the subversive intellectuals in Culture of Critique, like Freud, descended from rabbi’s: Justice Frankfurter, Marx, Rabbi Stephen Wise, Horace Kallen, Nathan of Gaza, and Walter Benjamin. MacDonald correctly notes that Jewish intellectual movements seem to follow in the Jewish tradition of a charismatic rabbi leading a congregation — yes, of course, many of these intellectuals were the black sheep children of rabbi’s.



wiseVII. Development of Leftist American Jewry

Many of the three million Russian Jewish immigrants (1890-1924) to the United States were “weaponized” by the charismatic and brilliant Reformed Rabbi Stephen Samuel Wise (the “Red Rabbi”). American Reformed Judaism, founded in Charleston, was historically not politicized, but Wise morphed it into the “Democratic party at prayer.”

It might be useful to view Jewish immigrants analogously to other immigrant groups like the Irish and their politicization from Tammany Hall. The Irish were left-wing until recently. The wave of Russian Jewish immigrants were similarly poor and reliant on unions and government services; they were tied into Democrat machine politics. Even as this cohort of immigrants advanced out of the working class, their political affiliation was passed on generationally (red diaper babies) since Reformed Judaism had been fully captured by the Left. They went on to “earn like Episcopalians and vote like Puerto Ricans.”

In Europe Jews are Orthodox (about 50%), and, in the USA, they are 10-15% Orthodox. By some metrics, European Jews are to the right of White Europeans. As always, the political positions of Jews are heavily influenced by sectarianism.

VIII. Organized Jewry

Paul Gottfried has done research showing how Jewish communal groups formerly run by Germanic Jews were co-opted by Russian Jews in the 1930s and put towards radical causes and Zionism. After World War 2, the American Jewish Committee appears to have swung to the radical left; it wrote a hagiography of “Marxism is Judaism” Stephen Wise. The ADL was similarly deployed for the cause of Leftism under the guise of fighting anti-Semitism.

These nominally “Jewish” groups run interference for the Left and intentionally put themselves out front and draw fire from right-wing critics. How much criticism is drawn to the ADL for their role as a proxy for YouTube censorship? If Jews are resented for their power and influence, how will using a Jewish group to silence opposition solve anti-Semitism? So, far from acting in a positive manner to promote Jewish interest, they are throwing Jewry in the line of fire and thereby exacerbating anti-Semitism.

IX. Ethnic networking was driven by radical sectarianism

MacDonald’s focus is on “Jewish ethnic networking.” Yet, here the evidence suggests that the most applicable paradigm is sectarianism.

  • Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, descended from Frankists, cited his friend Horace Kallen as his inspiration for Zionism. Brandeis was so intrigued with Kallen’s Labor Zionism that he considered quitting SCOTUS to pursue it full time.
  • Louis Brandeis and his Supreme Court justice protégé, Felix Frankfurter, reputedly both had mothers from Bohemia who were of alleged Frankist ancestry (followers of Jacob Frank).
  • Making a perfect trifecta, SCOTUS Cardoza was from the dynasty of a Sephardic Sabbatean prophet.
  • The alleged Sabbatean Rabbi Stephen Wise tightly associated with Brandeis and Frankfurter (They collaborated with the failed effort to save European Jewry from the Nazi’s).
  • Wise, in turn, partnered with Jacob Schiff (with reputed Frankist ancestry) in the founding of the NAACP.
  • Kallen’s Parushin secret society, as described above, was sectarian.

So, the dominant figures in the early 20th century Jewish Left appear to have networked as radical sectarians.


X. False Historical Narratives

A) The Russian Revolution

MacDonald describes the Russian Revolution as “good for Jews” and “constituting a spectacularly, arguably uniquely, successful case of what I have described as an ethnocentric group competitive strategy in action.”  This seems dubious as the population of Jews in Russia has declined by over 90% since the Revolution. Further, Orthodox and secular Jews were in open sectarian war, as described by Richard Pipes:

9a85b7fb0f81884bfb746c0140d93ffbEvery Jewish cultural and social organization came under assault. Evsekti, working with the Soviets, seized synagogues in Gomel, Minsk, and Kharkov. They particularly fought against the efforts of the sixth Chabad Rebbe R’ Yosef Yitchak Schnersohn (on right) who urged his Chasidim to resist to their last drop of blood, causing many of them to be arrested and sometimes killed. The Rebbe himself was arrested in 1927.

MacDonald describes the “horrors perpetrated by the early Soviet state were rooted in the traditional attitudes of the Jews,” except that traditional Jews were the victims:

The stated mission of these sections was the “destruction of traditional Jewish life, the Zionist movement, and Hebrew culture.” The Yevsektsiya sought to draw Jewish workers into the revolutionary organizations; chairman Semyon Dimanstein, at the first conference in October 1918, pointed out that, “when the October revolution came, the Jewish workers had remained totally passive … and a large part of them were even against the revolution. The revolution did not reach the Jewish street. Everything remained as before”.

It appears that Jewish apathy during the Revolution was, paradoxically, what caused the Communists to redouble their efforts to bring them into “revolutionary organizations.” Jewish support for Communists increased as the Civil War continued and the Red Army seemed like the only force capable of bringing stability. Jewish theology seems to favor stability through Dina d’Malchuta dina and amicable relations with Christians through Noahide Law. If the Jews were not the catalyst for the Revolution, what did cause it?


During World War I, Germany had no choice but to incite a revolution owing to Russia’s strategic depth and unlimited manpower. They did not want the same invasion folly as Napoleon. Churchill discusses:

In the middle of April [1917] the Germans took a sombre decision. Ludendorff refers to it with bated breath. Full allowance must be made for the desperate stakes to which the German war leaders were already committed. They were in the mood which had opened unlimited submarine warfare with the certainty of bringing the United States into the war against them. Upon the Western front they had from the beginning used the most terrible means of offense at their disposal. They had employed poison gas on the largest scale and had invented the ‘Flammenwerfer.’ Nevertheless it was with a sense of awe that they turned upon Russia the most grisly of all weapons. They transported Lenin in a sealed truck like a plague bacillus from Switzerland into Russia.

Germany paid Lenin over $1 billion to hand out monies to crowds and bribe military units and politicians to rebel. Further, the German army intervened in the civil war by attacking non-Bolshevik aligned regiments. The German investment paid off handsomely as it finally knocked Russia out of the war and resulted in generous territorial concessions.

On the eve of the February Revolution in 1917, of about 23,000 members of the Bolshevik party, only 364 (about 1.6%) were known to be ethnic Jews. Similar to how the British Raj employed the Sikhs, it appears that Jews were brought into the German-funded coup. Jews were literate, competent administrators, and condensed in urban areas where the burgeoning Soviet administrative state was to be located. Many of these cities, like Kiev, had a Jewish population in excess of 40%.

While MacDonald makes much of the pro-Yiddish Soviet programs, this cultural enrichment was done with other ethnic groups like the Ukrainians and the Latvians. The purpose was to appeal to ethnic minorities to help Stalin consolidate power. Within a few years Stalin sought to heavily persecute Jews.

Ultimately, Germany intentionally installed what was the most insane governmental system and leader in modern history until that time. If anything, the Revolution furthers the argument that Jewish Leftist radicals attack their co-ethnics if given the chance and bring destruction upon all of Jewry. Hitler later used “Judeo-Bolshevism” as part of his rhetorical justification for the Holocaust.

B) The Holocaust

If AltRight views of Jewish power, nepotism, control over immigration policy, and ethno-centrism were true, why did millions of Jews get killed like helpless Gypsies? Indeed, since the Holocaust violates the ethnic-interest narrative so absolutely, many anti-Semites deny it in the face of overwhelming evidence.

  • What accounts for Rabbi Wise’s astonishing indifference to Jewish suffering at Hitler’s hands? Did the Jewish Left view Nazi brutality as helpful propaganda (certainly the Holocaust has been used by the Left to tar nationalism ever since)?
  • Why did the Evian Conference fail (no developed countries could be found to take Jews)? Wealthy US Jews had a tradition of tzedakah. Couldn’t monies have been raised to save Jews in the 1930s? As in Schindler’s List, it does appear that sufficient monies could have bought Jewish safety, as was the case in Bolivia.
  • After Kristallnacht, why wasn’t a mass scale evacuation of Germany conducted?
  • Why didFigure-6-Zeev-Jabotinsky Stephen Wise try to foil right-wing Zionist Jabotinsky when he was warning that European Jews were “on the edge of a volcano” and needed immediate evacuation?

In this sordid tale, was right-wing Jabotinsky the authentic ethno-centric Jew? MacDonald claims that ethno-centric Jews abhor European or white identity, but Jabotinsky romanticized the Boers so much that he wanted to volunteer to fight for them.


C) Jewish Support of Immigration

Wise men will apply their remedies to vices, not to names; to the causes of evil which are permanent, not to the occasional organs by which they act, and the transitory modes in which they appear. Otherwise you will be wise historically, a fool in practice. ~Edmund Burke

Instead of observing underlying trends and paradoxes associated with capitalism, democracy, modernity, and the ascendant administrative state, MacDonald latches onto Jews as the driving actors of history.

As discussed extensively in my prior essay on immigration, there has been a political motive to import like-minded groups going back to the 1840s and the Irish. Short naturalization periods have favored politicization of immigration because new immigrants can be quickly converted into voters. This is why non-white immigration is overwhelming nearly all Western European countries, regardless of their Jewish population. The 19th century “Know Nothing” nativists tried to address this issue by extending naturalization to 22 years. MacDonald’s arguments blaming Jewish ethnic interest are a red herring to this dynamic.

To prove that immigration was in the Jewish interest, MacDonald focuses upon four Jews: two radical sectarians, Israel Zangwill and Horace Kallen, and two Leftist machine politicos, Emmanuel Celler and Jacob Kravis. Yet, with the assassination of JFK in 1963, the two surviving Kennedy brothers, Teddy and Robert, had a blank check to enact any legislation they wanted. They cashed it in to get the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Hart-Celler Act of 1965, which allowed wide-scale 3rd world immigration. RFK posthumously published “Nation of Immigrants,” written by JFK, to put the legacy of his deceased brother firmly behind this effort.

CaptureMacDonald is so obsessed with the role of Jews that he specifically exonerates Teddy Kennedy. It’s risible for MacDonald to claim that Celler, a bespeckled, diminuative, and relatively unknown Queens congressman, was the public face of the push for the ’65 law. Barack Obama, Patrick Buchanan, Ann Coulter, Breitbart, Democrat consultants, and NumbersUSA view Teddy Kennedy as the most influential figure behind the immigration surge of the last 50 years. The two Kennedy brothers both falsely claimed that the impact of the ’65 law would be marginal.

MacDonald erroneously focuses upon the 1965 immigration act, but the Civil Rights Act of 1964 made the 1965 immigration act a fait accompli. He claims that “the 1965 reform was thus not the result of popular pressure but rather of a 40-year program of activism,” yet the racially-restrictive immigration act of 1924 was already untenable after the Civil Rights Act of 1964 banned discrimination based on national origin. Further, subsequent immigration legislation pushed by Teddy Kennedy may have been more consequential, including the Amnesty Act of 1986 and expanded refugee programs.

While MacDonald makes a legitimate case that Jews would have had an ethnic interest in importing three million Jews from Russia from 1890-1924, this isn’t distinct from Irish politicians who pursued the same policy (and, coincidentally, the Irish did have malice against the traditionally Anglo-Saxon UK/USA).

What’s so peculiar is that he ascribes the 1965 legislation as similarly being in the Jewish ethnic interest despite no concomitant interest in importing Jews. According to MacDonald: “Immigration policy is a paradigmatic example of conflicts of interest between ethnic groups because immigration policy determines the future demographic composition of the nation,” but modern immigration policy has helped reduce America’s relative Jewish population by over 50%. His argument is inherently dubious from an evolutionary perspective. Rather, the interest of Leftist Jewish groups in pushing immigration wasn’t “ethnic,” but should be linked to coalition politics as non-White immigrants vote for Democrats at an over 82% rate.

At the time of the 1965 immigration act, there were over 1.5 million Jews still left in the USSR where they had been enduring persecution since the 1920s. If the proponents of immigration were acting in the Jewish interest, why wasn’t there a call to save them? In fact, the opposite is the case as Leftist Jewish groups ignored their suffering since the Jewish Refusniks were right-wing anti-communists. Thus, a low-level terrorist war and an attempted hijacking were necessary to draw attention to their plight. Allegedly Jewish-interest organizations, such as the New York Times and the ADL (right-wing Kahane even targeted the ADL to help the Refusniks), were opposed or silent until this became a popular right-wing cause in the 1980s.

According to MacDonald “Jewish activism on immigration is merely one strand of a multipronged movement directed at preventing the development of a mass movement of anti-Semitism in Western societies”. Yet, if this is the case, why have the dominant groups imported to the West been anti-Semitic? Latin American countries were not welcoming of Jews fleeing Germany in the 30s. Muslim immigration to Europe has caused a spike in hostility to Jews, returning matters to Kristallnacht conditions where synagogues can be burned with impunity.

When confronted with the obvious flaws in his thesis regarding Jews pushing for Islamic immigration, MacDonald resorts to teleological reasoning and use of the non-sequitur.

Even if we grant that Jews might feel more comfortable in a pluralistic society, he falls into a slippery slope insofar as growing an anti-Semitic non-white population will eventually redound upon Jewish interest. Indeed, in the last year, three Jewish Democrat Senators have been attacked by their own party in California, Minnesota, and Hawaii. In Britain, the Jewish Left has already been thrown under the bus in favor of Islam (so much for Jewish power?).

There is, as always, a sectarian dimension to this insofar as Orthodox Jews are visibly Jewish and are therefore at much greater risk from physical violence from Muslim immigrants. In Paris it is now risky to wear a kippah. yankelWhile Leftist Jews might support pluralism for their coalition politics, New York Orthodox Jews were victims of the “Crown Heights Pogrom.” Blacks targeted the homes of Jews by the mezzuzah’s on their doorposts. One Orthodox Jew, Yankel Rosenbaum, a 6 foot 5 black belt in karate, fought off a mob of 300 while the police stood by. His death prompted a backlash among New York Orthodox Jews, contributing to the election of Rudy Giuliani and their increasing affiliation with the Republican party.


D)
Iraq War

A major catalyst for the AltRight and widespread acceptance of MacDonald’s ethno-centric theory was the narrative of the Iraq War debacle being a “war for Israel.” MacDonald erroneously stated that “Sharon, as Prime Minister in 2003, was indeed deeply involved in the deceptions that brought about the war.” However, it turns out that Sharon desperately tried to stop the war.

CaptureThe warning against an invasion of Iraq was “pervasive” in Israeli communications with the administration, Wilkerson recalls. It was conveyed to the administration by a wide range of Israeli sources, including political figures, intelligence and private citizens.

The Likud party didn’t support the war.

Most strategists in the Israeli government and the Likud Party — including Prime Minister Ariel Sharon himself — did not share that viewpoint.  Despite agreement between neoconservatives and Israeli officials on many issues, the dominant Israeli strategic judgment on the issue of invading Iraq diverged from that of U.S. neoconservatives because of differing political-military interests.

Israel was more concerned with the relative military threat posed by Iran, whereas neoconservatives in the Bush administration were focused on regime change in Iraq as a low-cost way of leveraging more ambitious changes in the region.  From the neoconservative perspective, the very military weakness of Hussein’s Iraq made it the logical target for the use of U.S. military power.

So, the Bush administration and its NeoCons were more interested in leveraging more ambitious changes in the region and not Israel, per se, and were more akin to modern-day Jacobins in their monomaniacal obsession with democratization and lack of concern for Israeli security.

Israel fought a war against two militant Islamist movements supported by Iran — Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza — that were enfranchised and legitimized in their anarchic countries thanks to Bush’s insistence on hasty and ill-advised democratic elections “in this part of the world.”

Israel PM Ariel Sharon presciently warned Bush about the risks associated with the Iraq War and democratization. Sharon had managed the disastrous invasion of Lebanon in 1982 and confronted its resulting insurgency; he was perfectly aware of flaws underlying the Iraq War. 15 years later, Iran is now in Syria, Iraq, and has control over Lebanon. Iran has emerged as the great beneficiary of the Iraq War, just as Sharon warned. Yet, MacDonald risibly claims that Israel is “quite happy with the consequences“.

Realistically, in the days following the 9/11 attack, how could Israel not support Bush in his adventure, however confused it might have been? The United States had supported Israel in the dark days of the 1973 Yom Kippur War. So, Israel, as a loyal fiefdom, had no choice but to support the United States despite long-term risks.

X. Recent changes in Orthodox Jewry

Much of the reason for the flaws in MacDonald’s analysis comes from recent changes in Jewry and immigration politics. It wasn’t clear from the vantage of the 1990s, when MacDonald wrote his trilogy, that Islamic immigrants would swamp Europe. Nor was it clear Israel would become right-wing, or that Orthodox groups in the Diaspora would swing far right and seek alliances with like-minded Christian groups.

Approximately 50% of Jewish babies in New York City are Orthodox. The weight of Orthodox demographics is bearing down on Jewish political views, particularly among young Diaspora Jewish men, who are to the right of Western white men.

Capture

Yet, with the formation of Israel, Jews had to get down to the serious business of statecraft, something the luftmenschen had no capacity to serve. By 2050, Israel should have more than double the Jewish population of the Diaspora. Thus, inexorably, Jewry will be pulled back into a historical reactionary alignment and will likely seek to align with like-minded gentiles.


 

Advertisements

The Truth about Islamic Immigration

Although Muslims may seem to be just another ethnic voting bloc for the Left, this coalition is combustible. If Sweden is in a low-level civil war when the Muslim population is just 8%, what will it be like when the population is at 12%? Muslims will send Europe into chaos, just as they did in Israel. And, in the end, the Left’s political alliance with Islam may prove to be a fatal mistake that will end in its destruction, just as it did in Israel.

To explain this, we’ll put the current immigration crisis within its historical context to show how Leftist political machines work. We’ll start with the origins of politicized mass immigration in the 1840s, move through the 20th century’s increasing degeneracy, with Jewish and Irish involvement, then discuss the current year, and conclude with future trends.


 

A1. Irish Machine Politics and the AltRight of the 1840s

The most notorious Irish politician was Boss Tweed of Tammany Hall.

tweed

“Gangs of New York” portrays Boss Tweed buying off Irish immigrants for votes.

The “Know Nothings” were nativists opposed to increased immigration and big-city Irish machine politicians.

A fatal flaw in the Constitution was that it allowed newly naturalized citizens to vote, turning immigration into a ballot-stuffing technique; Just import huge numbers of an 220px-LCLevin-smallethnicity that overwhelmingly votes in one direction and you can implement a one-party state (what the Democrats did it in California). The Know Nothings saw Boss Tweed’s Tammany Hall exploiting Irish immigration as a ballot-stuffing scheme and proposed delaying naturalization twenty-one years to solve the problem.

Their leader was Lewis Charles Levin (right). He was the first Jew elected to the US House of Representatives.

Captur12e


A2. Immigration respite: 1924-1965

Immigration was restricted in 1924 to mostly “White” countries to reflect the existing demographic balance. During this restricted immigration period from 1924-1964:

This “American Golden Age” ended with the election of Fabian John F. Kennedy.

 

A3. Fabianism was the intellectual basis for the subversion of democracy through immigration

Fabianism was developed in 19th century Britain and proposed the gradual nationalization of the economy through manipulation of the democratic process. It is a more cautious approach than revolutionary Marxist politics. The Fabians wanted stealthy subversion so that the population wouldn’t realize what was going on until it was too late. Fabianism exploits how politicians lack the courage to address long-term threats, such as Islamic immigration, as Enoch Powell describes:

William F. Buckley’s National Review was founded, in part, to fight Fabianism. John F. Kennedy may have learned British Fabianism while studying at the Fabian London School of Economics.


A4. The Kennedy’s Federalize Boston Machine Politics: 1960-

The Kennedy’s were unique in the history of US politics in their extreme dynastic long-term ambitions. From the vantage of JFK’s father in 1960, upon his son’s election, he had two more sons who could be President and over a dozen of grand-children to follow them. Joe Kennedy controlled the Democratic party, so the only trick was to create a permanent Democratic majority.

After bribing his son into the Presidency, Joe Kennedy and his sons appear to have executed an audacious plan to convert the USA into a one-party state:

  • Civil Rights to bring Blacks into the Democrat party
  • Legalize public-sector unions (creating a kickback scheme from government employees to the Democrat party)
  • Import millions of 3rd world immigrants.

This plan could have succeeded, but JFK and Robert F. Kennedy were assassinated, Teddy committed manslaughter, and JFK Jr. died in a plane crash.

A5. JFK’s Assassination and the Civil Rights Act of 1964

With the assassination of JFK in 1963, the two surviving Kennedy brothers, Teddy and Robert, had a blank check to enact any legislation they wanted. They cashed it in to get the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Hart-Celler Act of 1965 (these two laws allowed for 3rd world immigration). RFK posthumously published “Nation of Immigrants”, written by JFK, to put the legacy of his deceased brother firmly behind this effort.

The Civil Rights Movement was bait-and-switch executed on a grand scale. What Blacks weren’t told was that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 made the 1965 immigration act a fait accompli. The racially-restrictive immigration act of 1924 was already untenable after the Civil Rights Act of 1964 banned discrimination based on national origin. This meant that tens of millions of unskilled immigrants would knock blacks out of the job market and onto the welfare rolls.

The other two crucial Kennedy innovations, public sector unions and mass 3rd world invasion, were deviously synergistic. Unskilled immigrants, as clients of the state, whether on welfare and food stamps or jail, would need to be cared for by unionized government employees. Since government employees are unionized, and these unions kickback donations to the Democrats, there’s a perverse incentive to import the least employable and most hostile people on planet Earth.


A6. Kennedy Legacy 1968-1990

Teddy Kennedy spent the remainder of his life pushing for unlimited 3rd world immigration: enabling chain migration, expanding immigration, and helping pass the 1986 Amnesty Act. Teddy Kennedy is widely viewed as the biggest proponent of 3rd world immigration by parties as diverse as Barack Obama, Patrick Buchanan, Ann Coulter, Breitbart, and NumbersUSA.

Public-sector unions benefit from degeneracy and the collapse of social order, since government social services are needed those who cannot be supported by a traditional family or community structure. Thus, incentives behind public sector unions, and thereby the Democratic party, are to destroy morality, family, and traditional religion. Accordingly, government institutions, like family courts and public schools, assumed a radical Leftist agenda.

The unrelenting machine politics of the Left sought to destroy families since married women vote Republican, while single women vote overwhelmingly Democrat. The United States has less of a gender divide than a married/single woman divide. Thus, the Left was audaciously building a new coalition of single women, imported 3rd worlders, radicalized blacks, Reformed Jews, and unionized government workers.

As degeneracy is allowed to dominate American culture and welfare incentives discourage work, the America workforce gradually grows dysfunctional. The result is that cultural decline feeds on itself. The more debauched the culture, the more its remaining institutions seek foreign labor and talent to replace Americans.


 

 

B. The 1990s: Elite’s Interest in Immigration

The Left understands that non-White immigrants vote for Democrats at an over 82% rate. Is it any wonder that virtually every Leftist party in the West has made importing non-White their highest priority? Why limit this immigration to poor non-Whites? Why not create a non-White elite for the Leftist machine?

In the 90s, minority small business lending programs intended for blacks were redirected to Hindu Indians and Muslims, who each get hundreds of thousands of dollars in sweetheart low-interest loans. Why do Indians, who are the highest-income group in the United States, still get preferential loans to out-compete white businesses?

National franchises like McDonald’s, Dunkin Donuts, hotel chains, etc. have a self-interest in these loan programs for franchisees and also for more immigrants as customers and employees. But, it goes beyond that. European-descended whites constitute less than 10% of the global population, and that number is steadily declining. This means that every global organization must primarily be in the business of appealing to non-European/Whites. So, the Catholic church, Corporate America, the UN… you name it…. their future is not you. Since culture is downstream of these global organizations, it means that the zeitgeist will be anti-White.

In marketing campaigns, any global organization must have a multi-racial appeal. Coke, which primarily sells it diabetes and obesity-inducing sugar water to 3rd world countries, first tapped into multi-culturalism as a marketing strategy in 1971.

 



C. The Left’s Addiction to Muslim Immigrants: 2010s

The EU’s worst nightmare is the rise of nationalist parties, like UKIP in the UK, but Muslims can be counted upon to vote against the national interest (at an over 90% rate). Despite near civil war conditions in Sweden and Germany, the EU continues demanding the maddening importation of Muslim voters. Far from acknowledging the fiasco where new “refugees” (mostly from Africa and not Syria) are engaging in crime sprees and remain overwhelmingly unemployable, the EU is doubling down by pressuring Poland and Hungary to take them and implementing Orwellian speech controls.

This chart shows large, continental EU member states with the longest and shortest naturalization length, in years. Islamic populations appear to be a function of short refugee naturalization periods and lavish welfare programs.

nature

It’s noteworthy that the outliers to this chart: Canada (3 year naturalization) and Ireland (5-year) are perhaps the two countries in the West making the most concerted plans to radically boost their Islamic populations. And Switzerland, which has a very high Islamic population despite a long naturalization, is being extremely aggressive in lengthening its naturalization even more. So, the exceptions prove this rule: immigration rates are related to extreme naturalization times (long or short).

An example of the Left’s obsession with Islam is the importation of Syrian “refugees”. Given the number of Syrian Al Qaeda and the difficulty in screening immigrants for radicalism, it would have made sense to import solely Christian refugees. Further, if ISIS triumphed, there would have been a horrifying genocide of Syrian Christians. Yet, the Obama administration did the exact opposite: out of 11,000 Syrian “refugees,” it accepted only 56 Christians.Ca1pture

So, it should be obvious that the self-righteous rhetoric about their profound concern for “saving refugees” and a “humanitarian crisis” was nonsense.  Leftists love using proxies, like a Florida shooting survivor (right), to present a victim up front to conceal the cynical machine politics underlying their positions.

The cold, hard reality is that Muslims typically vote Leftist at well over 90% with exceptionally high turn out rates. Syrian Christians, fed up with living under centuries of Muslim domination, would expose the ruse about “peaceful” Muslims, so they were left to die. Only through sheer luck was ISIS defeated and another Islamic genocide of Christians averted.

The point is that the Left can’t come out and say the obvious: “We want to import millions of non-Whites for ballot stuffing and as clients for our unionized social service workers.” One of their favorite tricks is to deploy Jewish organizations to talk about the Holocaust and Hitler (why would Jews want Muslim immigration when they hate Jews?). The most “Nazi” people in the world, who regularly threaten Jews with genocide, are Muslims. The Southern Poverty Law Center has over $300 million. Where did this money come from? This looks like more faux humanitarianism just running interference for Leftist machine politics.

The AltRight falls headfirst into this rhetoric and complains about a Jewish conspiracy when this is a red herring to the largest ballot-stuffing scheme in human history. You can’t really blame the AltRight for this misconception because Leftist Jews seem to relish drawing the Right’s fire. The AltRight, as a populist movement, has a tendency to fall into sensationalist charlatanism. As a result, instead of sensible policies, like delaying naturalization, they had the world’s media attention in Charlottesville (a gift of 10s of millions in PR), and their soundbite was: “The Jews will not replace us.

jewsEuropean Jews (red) oppose immigration much more than whites (blue). Europe’s Jews are mostly Orthodox. In the USA they voted 65% for Trump.


 

D. Intersectionality Politics: 2018

Since the Left no longer appeals to the white working class, they have little need for socialism. So, the Left has jettisoned its traditional ideological basis for the pro-Muslim raw tribal politics of Intersectionality.  Intersectionality distills gender and ethnic differences into an ideology purpose-built to maximize resentment of straight, white males (its boogeymen). “Assimilation” could be more precisely described as the process by which ethnic groups become comfortable with the USA’s pre-existing white/Anglo-Saxon elite. Intersectionality reverses this process by weaponizing women and minorities into perpetual victims and malcontents so that they may remain aggrieved Leftist group constituencies.

Intersectionality lumps Jews in with “White Supremacists” as oppressors. In effect, Intersectionality bumps out Jews for Muslims in the Leftist menagerie of ethnic interest groups. Indeed, in the last year, three Jewish Democrat Senators have been cashiered by their party in California, Minnesota, and Hawaii. In Britain and California, the Jewish Left has already been thrown under the bus in favor of Islam (so much for Jewish Power?). College campuses have become hotbeds of Intersectionality, where Zionism is now demonized along with White Supremacy.


 

E1. Negative Assimilation

The West, which lost control over the world and descended into madness in just 100 years, is the model for the East for what not to do. “White liberal” is an insult in China. Negative assimilation is the new norm.

It’s notable that the inspiration of Al Qaeda was an exchange student to the USA who found our decadent culture repellent. German Turks, for example, are more radicalized than native Turks.

osama

The Bin Laden family was very wealthy and heavily exposed to Western culture. Are we too narcissistic to see that Muslims are radicalized by our culture? Our maddening policy of importing Muslims not only destroys our countries, but also theirs. The way to allow Islam to reform itself is to stop bringing them here.


 

E2. Theology of Islam and the Left

To understand the Left’s obsession with Islam, beyond the mere voting numbers or social service clients, it requires a dive into Islamic theology and that underlying the Left.

 

Jesus’ responses to the three temptations of Satan were the exact opposite of Mahomet’s behavior. Whereas Jesus refused to use his divine powers for his personal advantage or for power, Mahomet often used his (false) claim of direct divine authorship of the Koran for purely personal ends (such as his various murders and marriages), and, of course, to make his religious teaching into an earthly, conquering, political force. In other words, Mahomet yielded to the temptations that Jesus rejected. Therefore, Muir concludes (and he calls this a suggestion rather than a dogma), if Mahomet was indeed inspired by a supernatural being, it was not God but someone else.

 

Similarly, Moldbug argued that the Left was inspired by a subversive “Crypto-Calvinism”, such as the work of Rawls and the Unitarianism of Harvard University. Further, as argued previously in this blog, the underlying paradigm of the modern Left arose from Frankism, a heretical quasi-Satanic sect within Judaism. Thus, it is no coincidence that heretical elements within both Judaism and Christianity would find common cause with an anti-Christian war cult.

• Mass Islamic invasion was first suggested in Israel Zangwill’s 1909 play, The Melting Pot. This play famously pushed the narrative that the United States was capable of absorbing huge numbers of foreign cultures and masked this in feigned nationalism. In actuality, Zangwill was a proponent of quasi-Satanic Sabbateanism and subversive sexuality mocking traditional religiosity.

• Horace Kallen invented multi-culturalism, but he had a bizarre obsession with defiling traditional Judaism.

The AltRight argues that the Left has arisen through “ethno-centric” Jews. However, the Jewish intellectuals featured in Kevin MacDonald’s Culture of Critique are mostly linked to the Sabbatean-Frankism schism in Jewry and are therefore are more precisely described as sectarians rather than “strongly self-identified Jews”. Nevertheless, the AltRight’s ethnic conflict argument should not be dismissed out of hand. The two most significant anti-White leaders, the Kennedy dynasty and Tony Blair, were both Irish Catholic and hated traditional WASP culture.

Captu3re


E3.
Can the Left control their new Islamic allies?

Muslims are not a traditional Leftist ethnic group that can be bought off with handouts, or who can potentially assimilate. Migration to foreign lands is a form of Jihad. The Arab does not live by bread alone. They are more like colonists, moving to a new land to eventually conquer. They grow increasingly hostile as their numbers increase, eventually starting civil wars once they reach a critical mass. This is visible in the West, not just in Muslim-dominated areas, like Malmö, but also in prisons, which similarly have been converted into islands of Islamic tyranny within the West.

But, what if politicians dare to restrain these Jihadi communities? Groom gangs in Europe are rarely prosecuted because Leftists politicians don’t want to offend their Jihadi base. Even if the Leftist/Jihadi alliance succeeds, as it did in the Iranian Revolution, it still ended badly with the Left’s destruction. The fatal flaw with the Left’s best-laid plan is that they can’t restrain the unleashed Jihadi monster.


 

F. The Future, 2019+: Islam’s Unrelenting Rule of Numbers

According to “Islam’s Rule of Numbers,” you can roughly quantify when a Muslim population has reached critical mass and will initiate a full-scale civil war (at around 35%). The rates of conflict should reach untenable levels long before that level is reached.

fabian

The Fabians, however, calculated that the White population wouldn’t realize the danger until it was too late and the Leftist / Brown political alliance would have already been locked into a perpetual political majority (like in California). The Left only succeeded in California because the Hispanic population was relatively docile in the 90s (no MS-13). So, while machine Leftists around the world may have been riveted by California’s successful example of destroying democracy and imposing a one-party state through immigration, they don’t understand that this example isn’t necessarily scalable and may not work with Muslims.

They fail to see how this strategy failed spectacularly in Israel. 10% is too small to be politically decisive, yet large enough to help cause shocking right-wing political revolutions, like Brexit, and reverberations like Trump in the USA.

Thus, the Left is mistaken. This strategy may backfire horrendously upon them, as it did in Israel. They are attempting to use free-speech controls to silence opposition, but the mathematics are inexorable. Muslims will grow even more sadistically brazen and repellent far before they before their numbers create a Leftist hegemony as in California. They will continue to be radicalized beyond anyone’s control merely by exposure to our culture. Since Islam is riven with Jihadi blood lust, no one can stop them: Not their Imams who have preached Jihad for decades and certainly not the panic-struck Leftist politicians who invited them in.

The question is how to exploit this error, end the crisis, and defeat the radical Left, once-and-for-all, as the Israelis did. (coming soon)

Here’s a good head start:


.

The Truth about Islamic Immigration

Although Muslims may seem to be just another ethnic voting bloc for the Left, this coalition is combustible. If Sweden is in a low-level civil war when the Muslim population is just 8%, what will it be like when the population is at 12%? Muslims will send Europe into chaos, just as they did in Israel. And, in the end, the Left’s political alliance with Islam may prove to be a fatal mistake that will end in its destruction, just as it did in Israel.

To explain this, we’ll put the current immigration crisis within its historical context to show how Leftist political machines work. We’ll start with the origins of politicized mass immigration in the 1840s, move through the 20th century’s increasing degeneracy, with Jewish and Irish involvement, then discuss the current year, and conclude with future trends.


A1. Irish Machine Politics and the AltRight of the 1840s

The most notorious Irish politician was Boss Tweed of Tammany Hall.

tweed

“Gangs of New York” portrays Boss Tweed buying off Irish immigrants for votes.

The “Know Nothings” were nativists opposed to increased immigration and big-city Irish machine politicians.

A fatal flaw in the Constitution was that it allowed newly naturalized citizens to vote, turning immigration into a ballot-stuffing technique; Just import huge numbers of an 220px-LCLevin-smallethnicity that overwhelmingly votes in one direction and you can implement a one-party state (what the Democrats did it in California). The Know Nothings saw Boss Tweed’s Tammany Hall exploiting Irish immigration as a ballot-stuffing scheme and proposed delaying naturalization twenty-one years to solve the problem.

Their leader was Lewis Charles Levin (right). He was the first Jew elected to the US House of Representatives.

Captur12e


A2. Immigration respite: 1924-1965

Immigration was restricted in 1924 to mostly “White” countries to reflect the existing demographic balance. During this restricted immigration period from 1924-1964:

This “American Golden Age” ended with the election of Fabian John F. Kennedy.

A3. Fabianism was the intellectual basis for the subversion of democracy through immigration

Fabianism was developed in 19th century Britain and proposed the gradual nationalization of the economy through manipulation of the democratic process. It is a more cautious approach than revolutionary Marxist politics. The Fabians wanted stealthy subversion so that the population wouldn’t realize what was going on until it was too late. Fabianism exploits how politicians lack the courage to address long-term threats, such as Islamic immigration, as Enoch Powell describes:

William F. Buckley’s National Review was founded, in part, to fight Fabianism. John F. Kennedy may have learned British Fabianism while studying at the Fabian London School of Economics.


A4. The Kennedy’s Federalize Boston Machine Politics: 1960-

The Kennedy’s were unique in the history of US politics in their extreme dynastic long-term ambitions. From the vantage of JFK’s father in 1960, upon his son’s election, he had two more sons who could be President and over a dozen of grand-children to follow them. Joe Kennedy controlled the Democratic party, so the only trick was to create a permanent Democratic majority.

After bribing his son into the Presidency, Joe Kennedy and his sons appear to have executed an audacious plan to convert the USA into a one-party state:

  • Civil Rights to bring Blacks into the Democrat party
  • Legalize public-sector unions (creating a kickback scheme from government employees to the Democrat party)
  • Import millions of 3rd world immigrants.

This plan could have succeeded, but JFK and Robert F. Kennedy were assassinated, Teddy committed manslaughter, and JFK Jr. died in a plane crash.

A5. JFK’s Assassination and the Civil Rights Act of 1964

With the assassination of JFK in 1963, the two surviving Kennedy brothers, Teddy and Robert, had a blank check to enact any legislation they wanted. They cashed it in to get the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Hart-Celler Act of 1965 (these two laws allowed for 3rd world immigration). RFK posthumously published “Nation of Immigrants”, written by JFK, to put the legacy of his deceased brother firmly behind this effort.

The Civil Rights Movement was bait-and-switch executed on a grand scale. What Blacks weren’t told was that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 made the 1965 immigration act a fait accompli. The racially-restrictive immigration act of 1924 was already untenable after the Civil Rights Act of 1964 banned discrimination based on national origin. This meant that tens of millions of unskilled immigrants would knock blacks out of the job market and onto the welfare rolls.

The other two crucial Kennedy innovations, public sector unions and mass 3rd world invasion, were deviously synergistic. Unskilled immigrants, as clients of the state, whether on welfare and food stamps or jail, would need to be cared for by unionized government employees. Since government employees are unionized, and these unions kickback donations to the Democrats, there’s a perverse incentive to import the least employable and most hostile people on planet Earth.


A6. Kennedy Legacy 1968-1990

Teddy Kennedy spent the remainder of his life pushing for unlimited 3rd world immigration: enabling chain migration, expanding immigration, and helping pass the 1986 Amnesty Act. Teddy Kennedy is widely viewed as the biggest proponent of 3rd world immigration by parties as diverse as Barack Obama, Patrick Buchanan, Ann Coulter, Breitbart, and NumbersUSA.

Public-sector unions benefit from degeneracy and the collapse of social order, since government social services are needed those who cannot be supported by a traditional family or community structure. Thus, incentives behind public sector unions, and thereby the Democratic party, are to destroy morality, family, and traditional religion. Accordingly, government institutions, like family courts and public schools, assumed a radical Leftist agenda.

The unrelenting machine politics of the Left sought to destroy families since married women vote Republican, while single women vote overwhelmingly Democrat. The United States has less of a gender divide than a married/single woman divide. Thus, the Left was audaciously building a new coalition of single women, imported 3rd worlders, radicalized blacks, Reformed Jews, and unionized government workers.

As degeneracy is allowed to dominate American culture and welfare incentives discourage work, the America workforce gradually grows dysfunctional. The result is that cultural decline feeds on itself. The more debauched the culture, the more its remaining institutions seek foreign labor and talent to replace Americans.



B. The 1990s: Elite’s Interest in Immigration

The Left understands that non-White immigrants vote for Democrats at an over 82% rate. Is it any wonder that virtually every Leftist party in the West has made importing non-White their highest priority? Why limit this immigration to poor non-Whites? Why not create a non-White elite for the Leftist machine?

In the 90s, minority small business lending programs intended for blacks were redirected to Hindu Indians and Muslims, who each get hundreds of thousands of dollars in sweetheart low-interest loans. Why do Indians, who are the highest-income group in the United States, still get preferential loans to out-compete white businesses?

National franchises like McDonald’s, Dunkin Donuts, hotel chains, etc. have a self-interest in these loan programs for franchisees and also for more immigrants as customers and employees. But, it goes beyond that. European-descended whites constitute less than 10% of the global population, and that number is steadily declining. This means that every global organization must primarily be in the business of appealing to non-European/Whites. So, the Catholic church, Corporate America, the UN… you name it…. their future is not you. Since culture is downstream of these global organizations, it means that the zeitgeist will be anti-White.

In marketing campaigns, any global organization must have a multi-racial appeal. Coke, which primarily sells it diabetes and obesity-inducing sugar water to 3rd world countries, first tapped into multi-culturalism as a marketing strategy in 1971.



C. The Left’s Addiction to Muslim Immigrants: 2010s

The EU’s worst nightmare is the rise of nationalist parties, like UKIP in the UK, but Muslims can be counted upon to vote against the national interest (at an over 90% rate). Despite near civil war conditions in Sweden and Germany, the EU continues demanding the maddening importation of Muslim voters. Far from acknowledging the fiasco where new “refugees” (mostly from Africa and not Syria) are engaging in crime sprees and remain overwhelmingly unemployable, the EU is doubling down by pressuring Poland and Hungary to take them and implementing Orwellian speech controls.

This chart shows large, continental EU member states with the longest and shortest naturalization length, in years. Islamic populations appear to be a function of short refugee naturalization periods and lavish welfare programs.

nature

It’s noteworthy that the outliers to this chart: Canada (3 year naturalization) and Ireland (5-year) are perhaps the two countries in the West making the most concerted plans to radically boost their Islamic populations. And Switzerland, which has a very high Islamic population despite a long naturalization, is being extremely aggressive in lengthening its naturalization even more. So, the exceptions prove this rule: immigration rates are related to extreme naturalization times (long or short).

An example of the Left’s obsession with Islam is the importation of Syrian “refugees”. Given the number of Syrian Al Qaeda and the difficulty in screening immigrants for radicalism, it would have made sense to import solely Christian refugees. Further, if ISIS triumphed, there would have been a horrifying genocide of Syrian Christians. Yet, the Obama administration did the exact opposite: out of 11,000 Syrian “refugees,” it accepted only 56 Christians.

So, it should be obvious that the self-righteous rhetoric about their profound concern for “saving refugees” and a “humanitarian crisis” was nonsense.  Leftists love using proxies, like a Florida shooting survivor, to present a victim up front to conceal the cynical machine politics underlying their positions.

The cold, hard reality is that Muslims typically vote Leftist at well over 90% with exceptionally high turn out rates. Syrian Christians, fed up with living under centuries of Muslim domination, would expose the ruse about “peaceful” Muslims, so they were left to die. Only through sheer luck was ISIS defeated and another Islamic genocide of Christians averted.

The point is that the Left can’t come out and say the obvious: “We want to import millions of non-Whites for ballot stuffing and as clients for our unionized social service workers.” One of their favorite tricks is to deploy Jewish organizations to talk about the Holocaust and Hitler (why would Jews want Muslim immigration when they hate Jews?). The most “Nazi” people in the world, who regularly threaten Jews with genocide, are Muslims. The Southern Poverty Law Center has over $300 million. Where did this money come from? This looks like more faux humanitarianism just running interference for Leftist machine politics.

The AltRight falls headfirst into this rhetoric and complains about a Jewish conspiracy when this is a red herring to the largest ballot-stuffing scheme in human history. The AltRight, as a populist movement, has a tendency to fall into sensationalist charlatanism. As a result, instead of sensible policies, like delaying naturalization, they had the world’s media attention in Charlottesville (a gift of 10s of millions in PR), and their soundbite was: “The Jews will not replace us.jewsEuropean Jews (red) oppose immigration much more than whites (blue). Europe’s Jews are mostly Orthodox. In the USA they voted 65% for Trump.


D. Intersectionality Politics: 2018

Since the Left no longer appeals to the white working class, they have little need for socialism. So, the Left has jettisoned its traditional ideological basis for the pro-Muslim raw tribal politics of Intersectionality.  Intersectionality distills gender and ethnic differences into an ideology purpose-built to maximize resentment of straight, white males (its boogeymen). “Assimilation” could be more precisely described as the process by which ethnic groups become comfortable with the USA’s pre-existing white/Anglo-Saxon elite. Intersectionality reverses this process by weaponizing women and minorities into perpetual victims and malcontents so that they may remain aggrieved Leftist-group constituencies.

Intersectionality lumps Jews in with “White Supremacists” as oppressors. In effect, Intersectionality bumps out Jews for Muslims in the Leftist menagerie of ethnic interest groups. Indeed, in the last year, three Jewish Democrat Senators have been cashiered by their party in California, Minnesota, and Hawaii. In Britain and California, the Jewish Left has already been thrown under the bus in favor of Islam (so much for Jewish Power?). College campuses have become hotbeds of Intersectionality, where Zionism is now demonized along with White Supremacy.


E1. Negative Assimilation

The West, which lost control over the world and descended into madness in just 100 years, is the model for the East for what not to do. “White liberal” is an insult in China. Negative assimilation is the new norm.

It’s notable that the inspiration of Al Qaeda was an exchange student to the USA who found our decadent culture repellent. German Turks, for example, are more radicalized than native Turks.

osama

The Bin Laden family was very wealthy and heavily exposed to Western culture. Are we too narcissistic to see that Muslims are radicalized by our culture? Our maddening policy of importing Muslims not only destroys our countries, but also theirs. The way to allow Islam to reform itself is to stop bringing them here.


E2. Theology of Islam and the Left

To understand the Left’s obsession with Islam, beyond the mere voting numbers or social service clients, it requires a dive into Islamic theology and that underlying the Left.

Jesus’ responses to the three temptations of Satan were the exact opposite of Mahomet’s behavior. Whereas Jesus refused to use his divine powers for his personal advantage or for power, Mahomet often used his (false) claim of direct divine authorship of the Koran for purely personal ends (such as his various murders and marriages), and, of course, to make his religious teaching into an earthly, conquering, political force. In other words, Mahomet yielded to the temptations that Jesus rejected. Therefore, Muir concludes (and he calls this a suggestion rather than a dogma), if Mahomet was indeed inspired by a supernatural being, it was not God but someone else.

Similarly, Moldbug argued that the Left was inspired by a subversive “Crypto-Calvinism”, such as the work of Rawls and the Unitarianism of Harvard University. Further, as argued previously in this blog, the underlying paradigm of the modern Left arose from Frankism, a heretical quasi-Satanic sect within Judaism. Thus, it is no coincidence that heretical elements within both Judaism and Christianity would find common cause with an anti-Christian war cult.

• Mass Islamic invasion was first suggested in Israel Zangwill’s 1909 play, The Melting Pot. This play famously pushed the narrative that the United States was capable of absorbing huge numbers of foreign cultures and masked this in feigned nationalism. In actuality, Zangwill was a proponent of quasi-Satanic Sabbateanism and subversive sexuality mocking traditional religiosity.

• Horace Kallen invented multi-culturalism, but he had a bizarre obsession with defiling traditional Judaism.

The AltRight argues that the Left has arisen through “ethno-centric” Jews. However, the Jewish intellectuals featured in Kevin MacDonald’s Culture of Critique are mostly linked to the Sabbatean-Frankism schism in Jewry and are therefore are more precisely described as sectarians rather than “strongly self-identified Jews”. Nevertheless, the AltRight’s ethnic conflict argument should not be dismissed out of hand. The two most significant anti-White leaders, the Kennedy dynasty and Tony Blair, were both Irish Catholic and hated traditional WASP culture.

Captu3re


E3.
Can the Left control their new Islamic allies?

Muslims are not a traditional Leftist ethnic group that can be bought off with handouts, or who can potentially assimilate. Migration to foreign lands is a form of Jihad. The Arab does not live by bread alone. They are more like colonists, moving to a new land to eventually conquer. They grow increasingly hostile as their numbers increase, eventually starting civil wars once they reach a critical mass. This is visible in the West, not just in Muslim-dominated areas, like Malmö, but also in prisons, which similarly have been converted into islands of Islamic tyranny within the West.

But, what if politicians dare to restrain these Jihadi communities? Groom gangs in Europe are rarely prosecuted because Leftists politicians don’t want to offend their Jihadi base. Even if the Leftist/Jihadi alliance succeeds, as it did in the Iranian Revolution, it still ended badly with the Left’s destruction. The fatal flaw with the Left’s best-laid plan is that they can’t restrain the unleashed Jihadi monster.


F. The Future, 2019+: Islam’s Unrelenting Rule of Numbers

According to “Islam’s Rule of Numbers,” you can roughly quantify when a Muslim population has reached critical mass and will initiate a full-scale civil war (at around 35%). The rates of conflict should reach untenable levels long before that level is reached.

fabian

The Fabians, however, calculated that the White population wouldn’t realize the danger until it was too late and the Leftist / Brown political alliance would have already been locked into a perpetual political majority (like in California). The Left only succeeded in California because the Hispanic population was relatively docile in the 90s (no MS-13). So, while machine Leftists around the world may have been riveted by California’s successful example of destroying democracy and imposing a one-party state through immigration, they don’t understand that this example isn’t necessarily scalable and may not work with Muslims.

They fail to see how this strategy failed spectacularly in Israel. 10% is too small to be politically decisive, yet large enough to help cause shocking right-wing political revolutions, like Brexit, and reverberations like Trump in the USA.

Thus, the Left is mistaken. This strategy may backfire horrendously upon them, as it did in Israel. They are attempting to use free-speech controls to silence opposition, but the mathematics are inexorable. Muslims will grow even more sadistically brazen and repellent far before they before their numbers create a Leftist hegemony as in California. They will continue to be radicalized beyond anyone’s control merely by exposure to our culture. Since Islam is riven with Jihadi blood lust, no one can stop them: Not their Imams who have preached Jihad for decades and certainly not the panic-struck Leftist politicians who invited them in.

The question is how to exploit this error, end the crisis, and defeat the radical Left, once-and-for-all, as the Israelis did. (coming soon)

Here’s a good head start:

 

@FrameGames: 20 reasons we know he’s LARPing as a New York Jewish Corporate Lawyer.

framesd@FrameGames is a pathological liar who uses a fake Jewish corporate background to push a phony narrative that immigration comes from a “diversity industry” and Jews. In actuality, he knows less about Judaism than most AltRight accounts. As discussed in my essay, immigration is historically related to voting and social service clients, not any specific industry or a Jewish conspiracy.

So, he’s using a fake background to push a false narrative. As will be discussed, he doesn’t merely lie about being Jewish/Corporate Lawyer, he gives false information to his followers. His M.O.  is using an exaggerated fake Jewish/Lawyer background to back up anti-Semitic canards and bogus narratives.

Why does FrameGames lie so much?

Unlike other AltRight accounts, Framegames is fully monetized through the cryptocurrency Steem. So, he just provides clickbait of Jewhate and uses the creditability of being a “highly Jewish Corporate Lawyer” to get you, the sucker, to watch his videos.

It’s risible when he defends the 1st Amendment, because, based on the evidence below, he appears to be engaging in fraud as part of a money-making scam, including impersonating a religious Jew and/or an attorney. He’s abusing the 1st Amendment and ruining it for the rest of us.

@FrameGames is not the only “Nazi in Jew Face”; @mattsoursemite is similarly LARPing as a Jew. We asked him several questions and he was unable to identify anything he learned in Hebrew school despite him claiming to have gone.

 



20 REASONS FRAMEGAMES IS A FRAUD

#1:  DODGES DEBATES WITH ME
Framegames made a 10-minute video specifically calling me out. So, this is my retort to his video. I posted dozens of times asking for a debate on Waski (where it would be fair); he dodged every time even though he was invited on Warski. Since he’s not going to debate me, I’ll call him out here.

warski
Instead of addressing my accusations, framegames wanted me to contact his lawyer to sign a contract (there is no way that I am doing this when the evidence is overwhelming as is). So, in sum, he made a series of accusations with a hit piece video, then ran from a debate on Warski.


#2: PATENTLY FALSE HOLOCAUST CLAIMS

The video’s Holocaust denial is ridiculous since Cole, the Jew he uses, rejects his prior views. In other words, he had to pull videos from the 1980s to find a Jew who denies the Holocaust when he knows that Cole has changed his views.

In this video, Frame discusses an article about the “Jewish interest in immigration” from 2001. Again, like Holocaust denial, he needs old sources to back up his nonsense that Jews are behind. In 2018, when Jew-hating Muslims are over-running Europe, no one in their right mind thinks immigration is in the “Jewish interest”. So, to buttress his absurd claims he makes up imaginary stories about “growing up Jewish”.

A) Generalized Charlatanism

#3: PREPOSTEROUS CLAIMS THAT HE IS THE TARGET OF A CONSPIRACY EXHIBIT A
Claims he will be murdered if he tells the truth

 

#4: PREPOSTEROUS CLAIMS THAT HE IS THE TARGET OF A CONSPIRACY EXHIBIT B
This is deeply problematic. Framegames made several tweets discussing a “Kraut and Tea” server “bombshell”. The problem is this doesn’t exist. He was just making up a ridiculous excuse why he dodged us questioning him on the AltJew chat on Twitter.


#5: CLAIMS HE IS PART OF THE “ALTJEWS” 

To buttress his claims that he’s Jewish, he claims that he’s part of our group. This isn’t the case. We all know he’s a fraud. 

At this point, it should be obvious that Framegames is a pathological liar, but we have 15 more whoppers yet to come relating to be Jewish and being a New York City corporate attorney.

B) False Claims about “growing up Jewish”

#6 CLAIMS TO BE A DEVOUT JEW WITH 10+ YEARS OF JEWISH EDUCATION
In Reformed Judaism, confirmation is going beyond a bar mitzvah and continuing Jewish education until you are 16. This is only for the most serious Jews. Framegames is claiming here to not merely be Jewish, but have 10 years of Jewish education (so he should not be consistently making silly errors that a seven- year old Hebrew school student would not make).

https://twitter.com/The_Rebbe_/status/964608495722090502

 

Also, he repeats this claims and says he goes to synagogue regularly and went to Shabbat Club every week.  Again, as always, his anti-Semitic canards are usually prefaced by his fake claims of being a Jewish insider. (see 7 minutes 30 seconds in mobile).


#7 CLAIMS TO HAVE ATTENDED AN IVY LEAGUE UNIVERSITY

Further, he claims to have studied at the University of Pennsylvania (an Ivy League university popular with Jews), so he shouldn’t be making so many silly mistakes about Judaism:


#8 CAN’T IDENTIFY HIGH HOLY DAYS
Doesn’t know “High Holy Days” are Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur

This deception is to further an AltRight narrative that Judaism is an anti-Christian religion.

Why is this a big deal? Because synagogues are standing room only on High Holy Days (like Christmas and Easter for Christians) and few people go for Chanukah or Purim, so every Jew knows this.


#9 CAN’T PRONOUNCE “TORAH”
Every Jew and even AltRight gentile accounts can pronounce “Torah” properly, but he can’t. This is our holy book and every Jew knows this, let alone someone who claims to have studied Judaism for over 10 years, and who went to Shabbat Club every week and Synagogue. (see at 2:30 mobile users). Correct pronunciation is here:


#10 LIES ABOUT HEBREW SCHOOL

Again, claims fictional experiences to support a narrative of Judaism as obsessively anti-Goy. We sing depressing songs all day. In reality, Hebrew school sings happy Jewish songs. This is some kind of weird mis-characterization of Jewish education as some kind of Holocaust indoctrination camp.

 

#11 UNABLE TO INDENTIFY HIS DENOMINATION
Every Jew knows if they are Reformed, Conservative, Orthodox, or Hasidim, the main blocks in the USA. Frame doesn’t know. He


#12 CONFUSES HIMSELF WITH ULTRA-ORTHODOX

In this post, @framegames refers to “his practice” and refers to Chabad, which is ultra-Orthodox. So, this is very confusing because he claims to be “Reformed” (Confirmation is in Reformed), yet her refers to his “practice” as an Ultra-Orthodox site.

 

#13 DOESN’T KNOW WHAT A MEZUZAH IS
Here a “Mezuzah” is to protect against the angel of death to kill gentiles. This is the  framegames pattern of using a false account of “growing up Jewish” to push an anti-Semitic narrative.


#14 HAS NEVER SEEN A MEZUZAH

Every serious Jew, including myself, has a Mezuzah. It’s impossible to be a serious Jew and not know what everyone has on their doorpost. In the 1993 Crown Heights Riots, blacks targeted Jewish homes by identifying the Mezuzah’s on the door posts of Jews. In other words, urban blacks have better knowledge of Judaism than @framegames does.

mezre

#15 NOT A NEW YORK CITY RESIDENT
What’s more serious is that he claims to live/work in NYC. Many Manhattan apartment buildings have these. I don’t think he’s lived in NYC.

 

#16 DOES NOT KNOW JEWISH ETHNIC GROUPS
Framegames thinks that Ashkenazi’s are the only ethnic group in Israel and non-Ashkenazi’s get thrown out. Israel also has Mizrahi and Sephardi. In addition to not knowing Jewish denominations, he doesn’t know their ethnicities.

 


#17 CONFUSES STATUTORY WITH CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Doesn’t understand the Equal Protection Clause is an amendment, not an act. Further, he confuses the interpretation of statutory and constitutional law. When I first busted FrameGames, Constitutional Lawyers came to his defense saying it was just an error. When I pointed out that his states exhibited no understanding of the US legal system, meaning it was impossible that he passed the bar, they stopped defending him.

https://twitter.com/The_Rebbe_/status/969700219230261248
https://twitter.com/The_Rebbe_/status/965288939732062208

 

#18 RIDICULOUS THREATS TO INTIMIDATE ME
Elsewhere he claimed that he could sue me based on hurt feelings (legal intimidation). But the 1st amendment precludes this. He incorrectly claims the 1st Amendment does nothing but protect against criminal prosecution in one of his videos.


#19 FALSE CLAIM OF SHABBOT CLUB STUDENTS STARTING FIVE “BLUE CHIP” DIVERSITY COMPANIES

In this video he makes the preposterous claim that the parents of his fellow students in “Shabbat Club” started five blue chip “diversity” companies.

Here @framegames combines faking being a Jew and New York corporate lawyer push a ridiculous theory that immigration comes from the “diversity industry”. (forward to 7:30 for those on mobile).

#20 DOES NOT KNOW WHAT A “BLUE CHIP COMPANY” IS

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_chip_(stock_market)

Blue chip companies are like Coca-Cola, Disney, PepsiCo, Wal-Mart, General Electric, IBM, and McDonald’s, which are dominant leaders in their respective industries. So, his friends in Shabbat club did not start five “blue chip” diversity companies. He’s manufacturing stories.



Framegames clearly doesn’t understand the NYC legal scene. He describes the diversity department at the now defunct Bear Sterns as part of the “diversity industry”, but as any Wall St. attorney knows, there was a huge crackdown on diversity at investment banks. So, they were all staffing up on blacks to help avert pressure from Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. In other words, this guy doesn’t know what he’s talking about and is passing himself off as someone he isn’t for his own personal profit.


 

Feel free to DM @framegames or tweet him to ask his comments on these 20 points. He hasn’t provided a single credible response. I would like to be disabused of the impression that this is some criminal psychopath exploiting the AltRight and eagerly await contrary evidence. The issue isn’t about Framegames being 1/4 Jewish. He might be. The issue is his numerous false claims.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Since the 90s, the Ideology of the Left has been Intersectionality.